Saturday, 19 October 2013

God bless America


                                       God bless America

Why? If you believe in God, why should God bless a nation? Why would God give preferential treatment to one nation above another nation? Is God prouder of one country above another? Is God really conceited to favour one kind of nation? And what would that kind of favour be like? Indeed, in the great scheme of Gods plan, does God care about such a thing as a nation?

So in the history of humanity, nationhood is a relativity new phenomenon. It is a construction of man's needs in the last few hundred years. Previous to that in Europe there were Kingdoms, Empires and people said God bless this Kingdom or that Kingdom, if they were Christian. Did he bless any of those kingdoms?

If God blessed a nation would that mean that nation would not have to suffer natural disasters? Would it mean that nation would be the richest in the world? Would God measure success by wealth? Would it mean that nation would be at peace with itself and others? Would it be free from tyranny? Does God think a bad democracy better than a good dictator?

If God blesses one nation, does he curse another or just ignore it? Is God so judgemental of a entire population of a territory on this planet that he would so elevate, one nation above another. Does he measure the goodness of each individual of a nation, extrapolate based on percentages of population who is the nation with the most holy, generous, kind, people and give to them beneficial acts?

Does God bless a nation by allowing it to win wars? Does God so like watch wars? Does he pick and choose which wars a nation shall win? Does he allow it's enemies strike into its heart and strike fear into its soul. Does he test a nation to see how it reacts to been struck? Does that nation turn the other cheek or fight fire with fire? Does God bless such a nation?

What about the nation of Kiribati that is sinking under the rising ocean of the Pacific. Did this nation offend God and he would not bless them and hold back the rising tides? I ask again. Why would God bless a nation and how would he do it?

Monday, 2 September 2013

World War 7


Okay, so this is a pedantic look at the number of world wars there have actually been. It is my assertion that the next global war will be World War 7 and not World War 3. These are my reasons why I think this way.

The first world war was the Seven years war from 1756 -1763. It was preceded by the French and Indian War that started in 1754 and continued as part of the Seven years war. This conflict was fought in Continental America,  Central America, Europe, West Africa, India and the Philippines. There would have been several naval battles/engagements as well. It is estimated over a million people died as a consequence of the war. This was a significant number considering the population of the world at the time.

The second world war was the American Revolutionary war 1775-1783. This war was not just fought in the thirteen colonies. The war involved not just France and Great Britain but several other European powers and Mysore in India. Therefore there were battles across several continents. There were tens of thousands of casualties due to this war. (It wasn’t just Mel Gibson that won this war!)

So the first two world wars were fought in the 18th century. The affect of these wars and mostly the affect of the Napoleonic wars was the decimation of the European male population. It took eighty to a hundred years to recover from the Napoleonic wars in Europe. Those wars were mostly fought in the European theatre and don’t constitute a world war.

The third world war was fought between 1914-1918. Most people had forgotten about the first two so didn’t think about what they were getting themselves into. There were millions killed in the conflict. As a consequence of this war it redefined the map of Europe, ended several empires and created the USSR as well as sowing seeds of next war. It was an imperialistic war for the most part, started by Kings. Also known as the Great war and World War I.

I don’t need to say much about what is known as World War II. Horrific loss of life and property. Again millions dead and ushered in the nuclear age. Soon after a cold war began began the two great superpowers of USA and USSR. The cold war was fought through spies, proxy wars, economic, military spending and cultural means. The cold war is defined now as a world war and therefore it is World War 5 by my understanding.

World War 6 is the on-going so called ‘War on Terror’ which is actually a global war fought by Western democratic nations against jihadist Islamic fighters. While they have no country of base, they fight on a global scale, on all continents. The number of dead is in the tens of thousands. The Twin Tower attack was the jidahist’s most successful assault. The USA has been the primary lead in fighting the jihadists.

Therefore the next world war that involves a number of countries or groups, fought across continents will be World War 7. When, where and how it starts is unknown, it could start in North Korea, India, South China Sea, Syria or from a black swan event. All I can say for sure is that based on historical evidence it will happen, sooner or later.  However as the end of the Napoleonic wars ended two hundreds ago in 1815, the Great War ended in 1918, it doesn’t bode well for the next six or seven years.

Monday, 26 August 2013

Amazing Fashion Show


I don't blog about fashion but this blog doesn't limit itself. I came upon this show in Dublin, Ireland over the weekend of August 24th. The atmosphere was electric, the music, and of course the amazing outfits on display. I did some digging and found the details of the show and designer Claire Garvey. The first two links are photos and the third is the fb page of the designer.

Thursday, 1 August 2013

Types of thinking


There are different types of thinking. Thinking is not a uniform thought process. Thinking is being curious, it is questioning the status quo, it is imagination, it is problem solving. Thinking is the most difficult action our brains and emotions can engage in. The brain likes routine, it likes habits, it likes what is known.

There is conscious and unconscious thinking, there is emotional thinking and spiritual thinking. The brain has a lot of work to do to keep the body functioning. There is some research to indicate the nerves in our body are more than just pain receptors but play a part in our subconscious thoughts.

So maybe our whole body thinks, like when you lose a limb and it thinks it is still there. Maybe feeling that which is not there is part of our biochemical electrical evolution. We need to be able to sense that which is not seen to protect us from the bear in the cave. Sometimes thinking is instinct.

We can’t see everything, we can’t smell, hear or touch everything, but we sense things. So maybe thinking is everything we are and more. Thinking though gives us a power. It gives us the power to prove if our instincts were correct or not. Instinct doesn’t replace thought, it only adds an extra layer.

Yet if we let instinct overrule logic, reason, evidence, deduction maybe we would not have gone into the cave and found protection. Instinct would tell me not to go into that dark place but thinking about the problem found a safe place to live. Do you rely on instinct to create realities to help you face life instead of using it to overcome the challenges of living?

Monday, 29 July 2013

Don’t just think - act

Are thinkers good doer’s? Can we accept the wisdom of words from people that lack the courage of their convictions? Is cowardice a failing for thinkers? What makes someone wise? Is it just the act of thinking? Is it thinking of acting? Is it someone who has taken action and then thought about those actions? Is it someone who thinks about the acts of others?

Yet history has given us many examples of all of the above. We have the knowledge of great generals, politicians, kings and queens. We have the knowledge of great writers, playwrights and philosophers. We have examples upon examples of how people behave when they are attempting to get power, hold onto power or are losing power.

However, I would say that writers are also acting. They are writing. This is one of the most difficult forms of action. If history has shown anything it is the power of words to inspire, to control, to manipulate. Thinking is free but putting thoughts onto paper has a price and sometimes that price has been the writer’s life.

So when you have thoughts, you decide whether they are fleeting or as permanent as they can be. You think whether they are worthwhile or not. You think whether something else is more important. It is up to you to decide to act on those thoughts to make them real or let them disappear into the electric pulses of your mind.

Friday, 19 July 2013

Sonnets to Rap - Where are the poets?

Poets used to be the rock stars of popular culture. The poems of history are seldom quoted now. They are the fabric of old societies with different philosophies and conflicting threads of human hope and angst. Where there used to be sonnets to woo a woman’s heart, is there now only rap?

In a couple of hundred years, will school children have any poets to reference, to entice, from our age of consumer culture. Instead of Shakespeare and Yeats will they have to make do with P.Diddy and Daft Punk? Will they laugh or will they cry at popular culture of our age? Will they take the words seriously?

We have an explosion of methods to allow the masses to creativity, yet has letting in the deluge of creative waters diluted the strength of the few, true poets in our time? Can poets make an impact in popular culture. It is doubtful, very doubtful. Ah but you say the singers and songwriters are the new poets. Really?

Was Bob Dylan the first and last poet of the modern era that will be remembered as culturally significant. I’m sure there are lots of poets out there but how many have an impact on popular culture across continents? Is there just too much noise drowning out the voice of the few. Are you a poet, muted by the many or a rapper whose lyrics are the lyre of pop culture?

Is there scope for a new poetry? Can you write poetry to inspire the masses? Maybe the poet must return to their roots and become the performer as well. Maybe the rapper will be the new Wordsworth? Maybe the poetry of our age is the noise of the many and the silence of the few.

Wednesday, 17 July 2013

The Panoptic society

Michael Foucault developed the concept of Panopticism. Since his death, it has inevitably moved to Post-Panopticism like most philosophical concepts e.g. post-structuralism, post-modernism etc. There is plenty of text written on the terms, what they mean and more importantly what they mean in our society in the early 21st century.

Quickly, Panopticism is the ability of the elite to keep the peasants under control by surveillance. Post-Panopticism moves the debate to the self control we exert on ourselves. The impact these concepts have on our society is under appreciated.

I believe the 21st century has a new architecture for the Panopticon. No longer is there a central column that allows the elite to observe peasants. I believe the central column has fallen. We now live in open cells, watching each other like never before. There is no elite. No one can escape the gaze of the other or the self. We all carry camera/video phones, use social media, live under the cctvs, tabloid newspapers have emails/phones hacked, take photos from great distances.

The issue needs to be separated into different strands. Some actions are covert like email hacking, data farming from companies data records, some are overt like CCTV, social media. Where are we going to draw the line? When we know our information, our actions, movements, pictures are tracked, then it is not merely observation? When we don't it is spying.

The Panopticon is concerned with the observed. We are in view of the others in the Panopticon but so are they. Like the philosopher said. 'What is private?' We give up information on social media readily. If the information is out there, then should we be surprised that someone is gathering/observing that information?

The question is choice or lack of it. We are born into the Panoptic society. It is difficult to put up a curtain on our cell. We must sever that link to the modern world to escape the Panoptic society. Could you give up your credit/debit cards, electronic devices, transport? Therefore we must accept the cost of our post-modern world or leave it.

It may be a case that the 21st century will be remembered as the century Panopticism became prevalent, accepted and finally produced a political and possible violent reaction. The generation that is growing up with new technology doesn't have the wisdom of hindsight. In general people just see the good of communication technology.

It won't be until two, three or four generations have lived in a Panopticon society that they will yearn for the supposed freedoms of people in the pre-microchip era and try to do something about it. Maybe the last war of the 21st Century will be about those who want privacy and those who want to make privacy impossible.